News
LePage: Let’s eliminate Maine income tax
AUGUSTA — Gov. Paul LePage said Monday that his long-term goal is to eliminate Maine’s income tax, but he reiterated his opposition to a plan before the Legislature that would cut the income tax rate in half while raising and lowering other taxes.
LePage made the statements at a press event at the Blaine House that featured an author who said Maine has been losing wealth and population to states with no personal income tax.
“My goal is … if I’m re-elected to a second term, at the end of that second term we would have no income tax in the state of Maine,” said LePage.
Then, referring to the Democratic majority in the Legislature, he said, “Unfortunately, with the current composition across the street, a lot of work needs to be done to achieve that.”
LePage said he remains opposed to the tax-reform plan from the Legislature’s so-called Gang of 11, a bipartisan group of legislators led by independent Sen. Richard Woodbury of Yarmouth, a Harvard-trained economist.
The group says its goal is to shift much of Maine’s tax burden to out-of-staters while equalizing the state’s reliance on property, sales and income taxes.
Its proponents say it would reduce the tax burden on nearly every Maine resident.
The plan, L.D. 1496, would cut the income tax rate to a flat 4 percent, increase the state homestead exemption from $10,000 to $50,000 and eliminate the estate tax.
Those cuts would be paid for by raising the sales tax by a percentage point and broadening the tax base by eliminating exemptions on most products and services.
The plan has run into opposition from the left and right. Republicans, like LePage, have derided it because it would raise an additional $160 million a year in tax revenue.
“Some of it is good because it does reduce the income tax,” LePage said. “The problem is, it didn’t stay neutral, so that’s bad. Will you see my name on a tax increase? No.”
The speaker at the Blaine House on Monday was Travis Brown, who wrote “How Money Walks,” a book that tracks the movement of income from state to state.
0 comments